24 June 2026 bruno

Co-owners Secure Judicial Enforcement of a €1 Property Sale

Off-Market Property Sale: Court Enforces €1 Transfer of a Condominium Swimming Pool

French Court Upholds Sale Agreement Despite Absence of Notarised Deed

Summary of the judgment of the Bordeaux Judicial Court (7th Civil Chamber) – 28 April 2026, No. 22/08711

The Association of Co-owners of [Address 1] (plaintiff) brought proceedings against the Swedish company SCALAB (defendant) to obtain the compulsory execution of a notarised deed of sale for lot no. 575 (a swimming pool and its surroundings) in a residential complex located in [Town 6]. SCALAB, the owner of the plot, had proposed in April 2019 to sell it to the Association for a symbolic €1, subject to the opinion of a property valuer and compliance with the law of [Location 8]. This proposal had been approved at the general meeting of co-owners on 29 June 2019, but the sale had not been finalised. SCALAB subsequently promised to sell the lot to other co-owners in September 2020.

Claims of the parties

  • Association of Co-owners:
    • To declare the sale valid (agreement on the subject matter and price, Art. 1583 of the Civil Code).
    • Order the compulsory execution of the authentic deed or, failing that, that the judgment shall take the place of the deed of sale.
    • Order SCALAB to pay €3,000 pursuant to Article 700 of the Code of Civil Procedure and to pay the costs.
  • SCALAB:
    • Contest the existence of a valid agreement: The phrase ‘subject to the opinion of a property valuer’ in its initial proposal would create a condition precedent (Article 1304 of the Civil Code).
    • Seek the nullity of the sale on the grounds of unfair price (€1, Article 1169 of the Civil Code).
    • Claim for damages:
      • €50,000 for loss resulting from the inability to sell the property.
      • €10,000 per year from April 2021 for the use of the swimming pool by the Owners’ Association.
    • Order the Owners’ Association to pay €6,000 (Article 700) and costs.

Court decision

  1. On the validity of the sale:
    • The court recognises the validity of the sale (Article 1583 of the Civil Code):
      • Agreement on the subject matter: Lot No. 575 (swimming pool and surrounding area).
      • Agreement on the price: €1, proposed by SCALAB itself.
      • Mutual consent: Evidenced by the favourable vote of the general meeting of 29 June 2019 (a resolution separate from that relating to lot 576, which was rejected).
      • Absence of a condition precedent: The phrase ‘subject to an expert’s opinion’ is not a valid condition, because:
        • It is not specified (subject of the expert assessment, responsible party).
        • It does not legally bind the two resolutions (separate vote).
  2. Regarding the claim for nullity on the grounds of a derisory price:
    • Dismissal: The price of €1 is not derisory in view of:
      • The context: The Owners’ Association was already responsible for the management and maintenance of the swimming pool, which is accessible to all co-owners.
      • The location: The swimming pool is situated at the heart of the residential complex and has no independent market value.
  3. Measures ordered:
    • Compulsory execution: SCALAB must regularise the authentic deed before a notary within 4 months of the judgment being served.
    • Substitution: Failing this, the judgment shall be deemed a deed of sale and shall be published at the Land Registry.
    • Orders:
      • SCALAB must pay €2,500 to the Association (Article 700).
      • SCALAB shall bear the costs.
    • Provisional enforcement: Rejected due to the nature of the dispute (property sale).

Legal issues

  • Boundary agreement in co-ownership: A vote at a general meeting may constitute an irrevocable agreement, even in the absence of a formal signature.
  • Condition precedent: A vague statement (e.g. ‘subject to an expert’s report’) does not constitute a valid condition if it is not precise and binding.
  • Nominal price: A symbolic price (€1) may be valid if it fits within a coherent economic context (e.g. property with no independent value, management already undertaken by the purchaser).

ASK YOUR QUESTION (FREE) - RESPONSE WITHIN A BUSINESS DAY

We will respond to all e-mail contacts within a business day. We Make French Law Understandable. The answer to your question will be written only by a partner of our law firm.